The Bible predicts the destruction of the world
with the Riders of the Apocalypses.

Chapter XVI. THE DEFENCE POLICY WHICH SHOULD CHARACTERIZE THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE OF THE WEST; THE EUROPEAN UNION. ("Project 666" by Michel Smiely "666"). The present expansion (1986-1992), and disarmament policy which exists today (1986) between the United States of America and the Soviet Union, is not based on a moralist awareness of the inappropriateness, dangers and risks involved in maintaining and developing an army and much less in the aspirations of idealistic peace. It is based on the enormous cost and economic bankrupt which threatens the great world powers, their overburdened economy and deficit, with the continuation of an irrational and unnecessary army. The present disarmament policy of the great world powers is the product of the burden of the enormous costs, not its inappropriateness. The United States and the Soviet Union have exceeded the limits of rationality by accumulating thousands of rockets and nuclear bombs and by having an enormous capacity for mutual destruction. Continuing and army in the actual levels has proven to be irrational when for example, mankind can be destroyed with only five hundred nuclear bombs. Under these circumstances, in which nothing is gained by the continued manufacturing of thousands of rockets and nuclear bombs for storage, and considering that in a war conflict there will be no time (nor need) to use them because the capacity for mutual destruction of the United States of America and the Soviet Union is more than guaranteed with five hundred nuclear bombs – just to cite an example- it is necessary and wise to limit the army and negotiate a disarmament based on realistic and just evaluations for the great world powers. This disarmament would hold the mutual destruction ability of the great world powers and with it, avoid surprise attacks on either sides. Thus, the armaments race should be limited and some disarmament agreements should be agreed upon because of the assured mutual destruction ability and the terror balance of the great world powers. The modernization which characterizes the military technology of today, (a nuclear rocket from West Europe can destroy Moscow, and a nuclear rocket from a Soviet nuclear submarine can destroy Washington in only six minutes), makes it unnecessary to continue the development of the armaments race which is in no way going to change the balance of power of the great world powers and which by cutting the time necessary for nuclear rocket to reach its destiny, also reduces the possibility of contest and detention of a nuclear war which because of human errors or unsolvable political crisis can develop or threaten to breakout. The desire to maintain the mutual destruction or terror balance which guarantees the pacific coexistence between the great world powers increases the possibility of maintaining, under adequate control, the development of events which, in different situations and without the existence of that power or terror balance could permit the development of a nuclear war.

This means that the actual disarmament policy of the great world powers, more than a moral value, have a real value of recognizing an historic situation in which the capacity and power of destruction of mankind has reached the most frightening limits ever known to history because it can destroy mankind and the Planet Earth. The present destiny of mankind is defined under this spade of Damocles which constitute the nuclear arms, that are always ready to be used to destroy the world. The European Common Market (the European Union), will have to take part in this political reality. In order to have this power, it will inevitably have to have a military capacity sufficiently powerful to gain world respect. It will also have to have the power of decision and force in solving and developing world events and problems. The present expansion (1986-1992), and disarmament policy which exists today (1986) between the United States of America and the Soviet Union, is not based on a moralist awareness of the inappropriateness, dangers and risks involved in maintaining and developing an army and much less in the aspirations of idealistic peace. It is based on the enormous cost and economic bankrupt which threatens the great world powers, their overburdened economy and deficit, with the continuation of an irrational and unnecessary army. The present disarmament policy of the great world powers is the product of the burden of the enormous costs, not its inappropriateness. The United States and the Soviet Union have exceeded the limits of rationality by accumulating thousands of rockets and nuclear bombs and by having an enormous capacity for mutual destruction. Continuing and army in the actual levels has proven to be irrational when for example, mankind can be destroyed with only five hundred nuclear bombs. Under these circumstances, in which nothing is gained by the continued manufacturing of thousands of rockets and nuclear bombs for storage, and considering that in a war conflict there will be no time (nor need) to use them because the capacity for mutual destruction of the United States of America and the Soviet Union is more than guaranteed with five hundred nuclear bombs – just to cite an example- it is necessary and wise to limit the army and negotiate a disarmament based on realistic and just evaluations for the great world powers. This disarmament would hold the mutual destruction ability of the great world powers and with it, avoid surprise attacks on either sides. Thus, the armaments race should be limited and some disarmament agreements should be agreed upon because of the assured mutual destruction ability and the terror balance of the great world powers.